Yanagisawa 992 alto saxophone
Guide price : £2700
Date of manufacture: 2004
Date reviewed : May 2004
Description : A very good-looking professional quality horn with some
been some debate for some time in the saxophone community as to the merits
of using different materials for body construction - so I welcomed the
chance to review Yanagisawa's bronze-bodied alto.
On first sight it's not actually that obvious that the body is bronze
- the slightly reddish hue could just as easily be down to the colour
of the lacquer. Indeed, it caught me out - and it was only when I glanced
at the model number that I realised the body was bronze!
Given the price premium, what do you get for your money?
Well, it's undoubtedly a very well built instrument. The pillars and fittings
are neatly soldered on, the keys are nicely put together and the whole
lot is finished off with what looks to be an excellent lacquer job.
I was particularly pleased to see a very substantial bell key pillar arrangement.
I've often commented before where horns have lacked what I consider to
be this essential feature, namely good support to a complex pillar that's
first in line for a whack if the horn takes a tumble.
Not content with merely providing a beefy pillar, Yanagisawa have made
it removable. Top marks there from the repairer's workbench!
The 'belt and braces' approach continues throughout the horn - there's
a good bell brace ( in the Selmer ring style ) and nice wide pillar bases
for the low C/Eb key...which is another key that often takes the brunt
of a knock.
body is topped off with one of the largest thumb rests I've ever seen,
and an octave key touchpiece to match. Comfortable? Oh, only a lot!
The horn also features the ubiquitous dimpled thumb hook - which I've
commented upon in the 901
The keywork has some nice features. Yanagisawa are big on braces, and
this horn features a double arm on the low C and B keys, and a secondary
brace for the link between the low F key and the Auxiliary F key above
it. I have my doubts as to whether such a brace works effectively on larger
horns ( due to the whip in the arm ) but it seems to work fine on this
The keys are well laid out, and with the blue steel springs and proper
point screws the whole action has a very positive and agile feel to it.
The setup was very good indeed - so much so that I rather suspect the
retailer may have tweaked it, though I still found the main stack action
to be a tad too heavily sprung. Rather surprisingly I had to strengthen
the bell key springing...it was a just a bit too weak, which leads to
a bit of bounce if you're not careful.
I rather liked the little plastic doo-dah that links the low C# spatula
to the low B. This gadget creates a solid link between the two spatulas
at any angle, and make a surprising difference to the speed with which
you can whizz around these keys.
A couple of minor points ( and we were doing so well! )...I didn't think
much of the placement of the auto F key. It was so far offline that I
even wondered whether it had been bent, but it appears to be where it's
supposed to be. It way too far back on the B key, and needs to be brought
much more into line with the key pearl. No big deal - this key can be
bent to suit the individual.
I found the top D touchpiece to be a tad too far down the body, so that
whenever I played a top D the base of my finger hit the point of the touchpiece.
I have quite long fingers, and I hold my left hand at an angle, so this
might not be an issue for you - but if it is it will get on your nerves
in no short time. The fix for this would be to round off the upper point
on the touchpiece - or, if you really wanted to go to town, have the whole
touchpiece moved up slightly. Bear this in mind when testing the horn
- it really is no fun to have that key dig into your palm every time you
hit the top D.
A minor gripe is that there are no adjusters fitted to the bars at the
rear of the stack keys - but that's more an issue for us repairers.
The horn is advertised as having an underslung crook. In fact it's not
a true underslung like the Conn 6M, where the octave key hole is on the
underside of the crook ( and the mechanism works in reverse ) - rather,
it's just a plain octave key that's been redesigned. Having said that,
it's been designed very well and will certainly be a lot sturdier than
the traditional design.
The keywork is finished off with a nice set of pads that have been well
fitted and well set - and the whole package comes with a sturdy but light
case that offers very good protection for the instrument.
And what a lovely horn to blow! Under the fingers the action feels eager
and responsive. I'd prefer it slightly lower, and lightly sprung - but
even the standard setup is more than adequate.
The horn blows easily throughout its range - whether you scream down it
or smooch away with subtones, it doesn't miss a beat...and glides effortlessly
between the extremes.
Tonewise it has a well rounded sound, and I get the impression that it'll
produce just about any tone you want with the right mouthpiece. Tuning
is excellent, and the tone is even across the range. It perhaps lacks
the power and cut of the YAS62, but then again not everyone wants that.
The client that bought this horn was looking for a darker, more classical
sound - and I'd agree that the horn has the potential to deliver that.
I can't really say any more about it - it's all there.
As to how much difference the bronze body makes - who can say? I'd certainly
advise comparing it with the 991, which has a plain brass body - you might
find the extra £500 or so for the bronze body could be better spent
on a mouthpiece that would give the same tonal response...and still leave
you with change for a few pints! If you can do without the underslung
octave key arrangement, you can save even more pennies.
I played the horn side-by-side with a couple of brass-bodied instruments,
but couldn't really tell whether it was the bronze body that made the
difference or the horn's design. If any comparison is going to be valid
then it'll only be the one between the 991 and the 992...and even then
the differences will be down to the individual horns.
My advice is to ignore the hype, disregard the body material debate, and
judge the horn simply on its merits...of which there are quite a few.
Definitely a horn for the top of the shopping list.