Swedging the keywork - pros and cons.
There's a lot of voodoo and mystique surrounding
saxes - but when you strip all that away all you're left with is
the fact that the sax is a machine, and a relatively crude and simple
one at that (at least in engineering terms). And like any other
machine it's subject to wear and tear.
Your brand new horn starts out life with an action that's tight
and slick - or maybe not so tight and slick if you bought a cheap
one. From the moment you pick it up and start playing, it starts
to wear - and it does this through the process of friction. Each
key is mounted on a pivot of some kind, and for most woodwind instruments
it'll either be a rod screw, or it'll be a pair of point screws.
If you're unfamiliar with either of these terms, check out the article
on point screws. As for rod screws,
well, read on...
A rod screw (or hinge screw in some parts of the
world) is pretty much as it sounds...it's a rod, with a thread on
one end of it. A typical modern sax will have around a dozen or
so such screws. There'll be one on the crook key, three for the
palm keys and another one for the front top F link, one for the
octave mech, a pair for the side Bb/C keys, one for the G# cup key
- and depending on the design of the sax maybe one for the low C/Eb
key and one for the low C#. And then there are the two long rods
screws for the upper and lower stack (the left and right hand main
key groups). The rest of the keys will be mounted on point screws.
Dealing with wear on keys mounted on point screws is generally pretty
easy - but worn keys mounted on rod screws require a rather more
Let's have a look at the problem in detail.
The upper example in the graphic below shows a shiny new sax key
sitting on its rod screw - rather exaggerated for clarity. It's
a very simple mechanism; the key barrel (or hinge tube...in those
other parts of the world again) is just a brass tube and the screw
is a solid rod of steel. It's usually silver steel, but it could
be plain mild steel, stainless steel or, less commonly, some kind
of alloy such as nickel silver. Most barrels will have one or more
attachments, such a key cup, a touchpiece or some sort of connecting
order that your shiny new key doesn't wobble about, the tolerance
between the diameter of the rod screw and that of the hole through
the barrel (known as the bore) will be reasonably close. I say reasonably
because while there are set standards for clearances and fits in
engineering, woodwind keywork just isn't built that accurately.
And with good reason.
For a start, the keys themselves are quite soft and flexible - and
the keywork as a whole has no provision for preventing dust and
grit getting into the key barrel. It has to work over a wide range
of temperatures and each key must be free to move with only the
So what sort of tolerance are we talking about? Ideally it's around
0.01mm, which is just under half a thou in old money. And that's
across the diameter - so the actual clearance between one side of
the rod screw and the opposing face of the bore will be half of
To put that into a real-world perspective you can take a rod screw
with a diameter of 2.84mm and slide it nicely into a stack key from
a Conn 10M. The key will move freely with no sign of wobble. Pop
a 2.85mm rod in and you'll notice that while it will just about
go into the barrel, the key will no longer be able to move freely
on it. 2.84 was a sliding fit, 2.85mm is an interference fit - which
gives you a very rough guide as to the clearance required.
This ideal clearance is denoted by the thin red lines on the upper
example of the graphic.
Now, I said ideally because keys are rarely made
with such accuracy. If I took all the keys off a Conn 10M (and we're
assuming it's factory fresh) I could bet you a pie and a pint I'd
be able to find at least one key in which the 2.85mm rod would be
a perfect sliding fit. And I could probably find a good few where
the rod would slide part of the way in and then begin to bind up
- and this will be due to inaccurate boring of the barrel or a slight
bend in it.
And all of this assumes that the rod screw itself is dimensionally
accurate over its length...which isn't always the case.
Anyway, this is our starting point with a new
key; a rod screw of a known diameter and a barrel that's bored out
to be 0.01 larger. Everything is nice and tight. But as time goes
by the key will wear - and when it does so the wear will accumulate
on both the bore of the barrel and the rod screw (though to a lesser
degree), as shown in the lower example. The key now has at least
twice the clearance it had from new.
this does to the action is quite subtle. For the smaller keys and
those that stand alone (i.e. not connected to any other key) it
hopefully won't make that much of a difference. The keys will operate
normally and unless the wear is extreme it's unlikely to result
in a leak on a key with a pad on it. However, it will probably be
rather noisy and advanced players may notice that the key feels
imprecise in operation and the horn doesn't quite speak as quickly
and responsively as it once did.
Here's a perfect example of a wobbly key, and shows you precisely
how you can test your own keys for wear. Just grab one end of the
key and try to wobble it from side to side. In this instance there
are more problems than excessive clearance in the key barrel because
you can actually see the barrel sliding back and forth between the
pillars. It was made like this.
For keys that are linked to other keys - such
as on the main stacks - the effect of this wear is rather more insidious.
The principle of linked keys is pretty simple; you press one key
down and another one goes down at the same time. Press your low
F key down and you'll see that the key cup above it (the Auxiliary
F) also comes down. Such keys are linked together by a bar coming
off one key that sits over the foot of the other key. Inbetween
this connection there'll be a thin buffer - either a piece of cork
or felt - and this is the means by which we 'regulate' the movement
of both keys so that they close together at exactly the same time.
But there are a lot of factors working against this regulation.
There's the flex in the keywork; you'll be hard put to see it, but
it's there. There's also the force of the springs trying to push
the keys back up. And then there's the potential compression of
the regulation buffer and, finally, that of the pads. It's all conspiring
against you to lift that linked key up and create a nasty little
So you can imagine that it makes a great deal of sense to minimise
these factors. This can be done by fitting thin and firm regulation
buffers (though this can induce key noise) or by using firm pads
(again, can be noisy - and sometimes uncomfortable under the fingers
for some players) - but as for the flex in the keywork, there's
really not a lot you can do about that.
But now chuck in some wear in the key barrels. You press the F key
down, the Aux.F key comes down with it...the springs push back,
the regulation buffer compresses a bit, the pads compress, the key
flexes...and all this opposing force looks around for somewhere
to go. And whaddya know...it finds that the keys are worn and can
move on their pivots. So the Aux.F rises. Oh, it won't be by much
- but bear in mind that a gap of just one thou between the pad and
the tonehole constitutes a leak. If it's just the one key that's
worn it probably won't be that much of a deal - you'll usually be
able to blow right through it. But when one key has worn it usually
means that others have too - so by the time you get down to the
low notes you could be looking at a number of leaks due to worn
keywork. That's rather harder to blow through.
I mentioned firm pads, and at this point it's
worth saying that they can be very unforgiving. They're going through
a bit of a trend these days and I see quite a lot of horns that
have been fitted with them that have subsequent problems. Part of
this is down to being badly fitted and set, and part of it's down
to insufficient preparation. With so little give in these pads a
perfectly flat tonehole and a level key cup is a must. But it should
also be noted that a tight action is necessary. You can do all the
tonehole and cup levelling you like, and spend an hour setting each
pad - but if there's even a slight bit of wear in the keywork a
hard pad will punish this oversight mercilessly.
hopefully clear, then, what effects a worn action can have - but
it gets a bit worse, because wear tends to beget wear.
Here's our worn key at rest. Because there's a spring acting against
it (to hold it open), the force of the spring takes up the wear
and causes the key to tilt along its axis. You can see that the
key barrel is now only touching the rod screw at each end.
Each time you press and release the key the contact point shifts
up and down the barrel - but the area that will see the most contact
will be that at each end of the barrel. So this'll wear more because
this is where most of the friction will be concentrated.
Over a period of time the situation gets worse
- and then another kind of wear creeps in.
Because the key barrel is now canted, it no longer sits square to
the face of the pillar. This means that friction is concentrated
in one area rather than spread over the entire end of the barrel.
You can see that the rear portion of the barrel has some clearance
- so it's not touching the pillar - but the front portion is. Little
by little, bit by bit, this'll wear down...and at a faster rate
than had the pillar been making full contact with the end of the
now it gets even worse - because with that increased gap on one
side of the barrel there's more scope for larger particles of grit
and dust to find their way inside the barrel. How it does this is
quite fascinating. In my article on Oiling
the action - for geeks I noted that the process of pressing
and releasing a key causes the key barrel to flex. It's only very
slightly, of course, but in so doing it acts like a pump - pushing
oil out of the barrel as the key goes down and sucking it back in
again as it's released. The oil that gets pushed out gathers where
the end of the key barrel meets the pillar. Because it's such a
small amount of oil, surface tension prevents most of it from dribbling
down the pillar - but while it's hanging around it has the potential
to pick up any grit that may have adhered to the oil left behind
from previous pumping cycles. As the key rises and sucks the oil
back into the barrel, it carries this grit with it.
The grit now mixes with the oil and acts like a very, very fine
abrasive - and this can only mean one thing...more wear. Sure, it
won't happen overnight - but each time you play the horn it gets
just that tiny little bit worse. Leave it long enough and the key
will end up like that top D key - being able to wobble on its rod
screw and being able to rattle about between the pillars.
So what can be done about all this doom and gloom?
Simple - have the keywork tightened up. Yep, take it along to your
local friendly repairer and have them swedge the keys. Job done,
Well, maybe not. Let's have a look at what swedging is, and talk
about the pros and cons. First off, though, it's pronounced 'swayjing'.
Don't ask me why, that's just the way it is.
Swedging is, to all intents and purposes, a form of crimping. What
the process does is deform the key barrel by compressing it. This
does two things; it reduces the diameter of the barrel (internally
and externally) and it stretches the barrel. In this way it can
deal with wear within the barrel and wear between the pillars. Very
you might imagine, there are special tools for this job - which,
in the main, tend to be swedging pliers. There are two ways to acquire
them, the first being that you buy a pair or two from a repair supply
store. The second way is that after the ones you've bought have
broken, or failed to give you the results you desire, you make your
own...just like the ones you see here.
Every repairer has their own idea about what makes for a good pair
of swedging pliers - so designs and sizes will vary - but they all
have one thing in common; the business end of the pliers should
be highly polished. This helps to prevent marking the keys.
I say 'helps' because it can often be quite a brutal process; you
may need to apply a considerable amount of pressure to the key barrel
- and even with the smoothest jaws and perhaps a protective grease,
wax or film, there's always a chance that you'll leave what we call
'witness marks' behind. Sometimes its inevitable. If a key has poor
quality or flaking plating or lacquer, just the application of pressure
alone will damage it.
There's also the chance that you might leave
ripples behind. Some keys may have been harshly buffed at some point,
which leaves the barrels out of round (some metal has effectively
been polished away) - and this will affect the neatness of the job.
If there's any grit between the tool and the barrel it will leave
score marks - as may any imperfections in the tool's jaws.
The tool at the bottom is a variation on a theme,
being what we call a collet swedger. It works on the same principle
except that it uses a collet (a sort of chuck) to apply the pressure.
It can produce a neater job sometimes, and can deal with very short
barrels that would otherwise be difficult to handle with pliers...but
it won't exert as much pressure.
Swedging is particularly hard on the hands - especially
if you're dealing with nickel silver keywork (much tougher than
brass), such as you might find on the King Super 20. After a day's
swedging on one of these beasts it can take you a good half an hour
before you can actually open your hand again. To overcome this problem
you can buy/make a larger tool...or, if you're a cheapskate like
me, you can pop a couple of steel tubes over the handles to act
as an extension...thus significantly increasing the amount of pressure
you can exert for less effort.
how the tool works.
You start by cleaning everything. The tool's jaws, the exterior
of the key barrel, the interior and the rod screw. You fit the rod
into the barrel, apply your favourite barrier to the jaws then clamp
them around the part of the barrel you want to tighten, and then
squeeze the pliers hard.
Various techniques can be used. Some people favour clamping down
and rotating the key or the pliers, moving slowly back and forth
along the length of the barrel. Others prefer to clamp down in one
spot, release the pliers, rotate them or the key then clamp down
again. Or perhaps a combination of techniques depending on the key
in question. The collet swedger is used in a similar fashion, although
it doesn't take too well to the second method.
As with many repair techniques there's a bit of a knack to it. If
you go steaming in with a swedger you might find that all your key
barrels end up slightly bent. This is because swedging induces torsion
in the key barrel - and unless you're careful to balance this out,
you'll run into problems. They won't be especially difficult to
correct, but it will take time. On a key like the one on the right,
which has two separate barrels, you will nearly always have to realign
them after swedging. But by far the biggest 'gotcha!' is attempting
to swedge a barrel onto a rod screw that's worn in the middle. I'll
leave you to work out why that rookie mistake is a bit of a doozy...
It's at this point I'd like to have a moan about
one of the swedging techniques I see on a regular basis - which
I call 'end-swedging'.
In the above paragraph I mentioned that you move the pliers along
the length of the barrel. The reason you (or at least I) do this
is because wear is present along the entire length of the barrel.
If someone asked me to remove the wear, I remove it all - or at
least as much as is possible - and not just a bit of it.
The thing is, end-swedging does the job. If you take your worn out
horn to a repairer and they end-swedge they keys and return it to
you, you'll probably be very happy with an apparently now-tight
action. For a while, at least.
what end-swedging looks like.
You can see that the barrel has excess clearance along its entire
length, except for the ends of the barrel where the swedging tool
has done its work. Because the wear has been taken out at each end,
the rod screw can't flop about inside the barrel. But now there's
only a limited amount of contact between the rod and the barrel,
which means that all future wear will be concentrated at those points...and
when you concentrate friction, you increase the rate at which wear
In a relatively short space of time the barrel ends will wear and
will need swedging again.
It also leads to a rather unpleasant look - because the diameter
of the barrel ends will now be slightly smaller than the rest of
the barrel - and if the process is repeated you almost always end
up with a rather ugly taper.
Why do people do this? I don't really know. I
suppose it saves time, but then doing half a job always saves someone
time...and costs someone else more money in the end.
I've been told that some people say that it allows for the key to
maintain a reservoir of oil in the barrel - and so it does, for
about as long as it takes for someone to press the key down. The
resultant pumping action will push out the excess oil, but the increased
clearance further inside the barrel will not allow all that oil
to be sucked back in again. You just end up with oily pillars, and
your action wears that much faster. In any event, the normal amount
of clearance is entirely sufficient to maintain a film of lubrication
between the rod screw and the key barrel.
So I consider it to be nothing more than a bodge - a temporary repair
that gets you out of trouble for a while when you're a bit short
on funds. Or a quick way of making a worn out horn appear to be
in better shape than it really is prior to selling it. Fortunately
it's often quite easy to spot if a horn's action has been end-swedged
- just look out for witness marks or tapered/reduced barrel ends.
are also some limitations as to what swedging can do and how much
wear it can take up, and this is largely down to the ability (or
otherwise) to get the tooling onto the key.
So far I've shown key barrels with even wear right along the length
- but in practice a barrel doesn't wear in this fashion. Here's
what really happens. There's a certain amount of wear that extends
along the entire length of the barrel, but as the key becomes more
and more able to tilt along its axis, the wear begins to increase
at each end.
Once this happens it leads to another problem, because the key can
now tilt enough to allow a fulcrum point to develop further along
the barrel - and this will typically gravitate towards the spot
where the tip of the key's spring sits (which may or may not incorporate
a key arm). In this instance (on the right) the tip of the spring
sits in the right hand key arm - and the tilting of the key combined
with whatever flex there is in the key has led to a 'pocket' of
You can probably see the problem that arises from
this; namely that there are a couple of areas where you're not going
to be able to get at with your swedging tools - and so even given
your very best efforts you're simply not going to be able to remove
all the wear. However, you'll be able to deal with most of the wear
in the middle of the key - and you have enough 'meat' at each end
of the barrel to ensure that whatever swedging you're able to manage,
it will at least prevent the key from being able to tilt for quite
some considerable time.
here's another example. This time the key arms are positioned at
the ends of the key barrel - and just as in the above graphic we
have two point of wear that can't be addressed. You can make the
rest of the barrel as tight as you like, but you really can't do
much about the wear beneath the key arms. You could 'peen' (essentially
squash) the ends of the barrel, but that leaves you with an awfully
small bearing surface that simply isn't going to stand up to a great
deal of wear.
In this instance you'll have to rely on the centre portion of the
barrel to do most of the work - as it largely will for a good long
while. But such keys are more prone to rapid wear than the example
a similar theme there are keys where the key arms are so close together
that not even the thinnest pair of pliers can get into the gap between
them - as well as keys that don't really have much of a barrel at
all, such as the lower end of this Auxiliary B key from an old alto.
It's just about got enough of a barrel to get a tool on, but the
job would still leave around 50% of the barrel still with wear in
it. On many older horns you'll find such keys with no barrel at
all - there's just a hole drilled through the key arm. In such instances
peening the arm is about all you can do...unless you want to do
a proper job and fit a bush. There are also keys where the design
precludes the stretching of the key barrel - such as the low C on
later Martins; and it's not all about saxes, there are keys on flutes
and clarinets that can't be swedged.
Which leads me onto another moan. I can understand why many older
horns had such foibles, but it really is disappointing to come across
a modern horn where no thought has been given as to how the action
might be tightened up after a good few years of use. Granted, it's
thankfully uncommon on saxes these days - but it still crops up
from time to time...and it really ticks me off. There's no excuse
for it - and I think the world would be a much happier place if
manufacturers of all kinds of gadgets were required by law to throw
their products at a repairer before being allowed to place them
on the market. I feel better for having got that off my chest....
If we look even closer at what happens when a
key is swedged we can spot another issue.
The whole process is somewhat 'organic' by nature. I mean, you're
trying to compress a brass tube of possibly varying diameters against
a rod screw of potentially equally variable ones.
way to mitigate some of that is to replace the rod with a new one.
By swedging a key and (very) carefully cutting it in half - then
running an accurately ground bar smeared with a little marking blue
along the bore - it's possible to see that the bore of the barrel
isn't compressed evenly along its length. There are ripples, peaks
and troughs which leave wear patterns like these shown on the right.
OK, so this is being extremely picky - but it nonetheless shows
that while a great deal of a wear has been taken out, it's by no
means all of it...and you have to add that to the areas that you
simply can't get your tooling on.
It's essentially all about percentages. A new, well-built horn comes
with an action that has 100% contact between the rod screws and
the key barrels. Now, I say "100% contact" but in fact
it isn't really that at all. An accurately bored barrel and a close-fitting
rod screw will have space for a film of oil between them that keeps
them apart - at least while the key is under no stress. If you were
to hold a cleaned and degrease key barrel upright and drop an equally
clean rod screw into it, it would pass straight through the barrel....then
hit the floor and ping off somewhere you'll never find it. At least
not until you've made a new one.
The moment you apply stress you'll force some of that clearance
closed and rubbing will occur. The lubrication will go some way
to limiting the effect of that, but it won't prevent some wear occurring.
What that 100% really means is that there is potential for
full contact - and that any rubbing due to the key being stressed
will be distributed over as wide an area as possible. When you lose
a percentage of that potential contact it shifts the rubbing action
into an ever-decreasing area, which then wears faster.
A repairer's job is to take a worn action which might be running
at, say, 70% contact and bring it back to as near as possible to
100%. And as we've seen from all of the above, that can be a tough
So what's the alternative?
Well, as already mentioned, changing out the rod screws will help.
This allows you to swedge down to a known and accurate diameter.
Another little trick is to overswedge. You can either do this by
really bearing down on your swedging pliers (at the risk of damaging
the lacquer or plating, and your hand) or you can use a set of very
slightly (and only very slightly) undersized rods - and thereafter
lap the original or replacement rods in with a suitable compound.
It's worth bearing in mind that lapping will reduce the diameter
of the rods very slightly, so its often worth using the old rods
for most of the work and then replacing them with new ones...which
won't usually require a great deal of lapping, if any at all. But
even if you don't damage the finish, it's likely to leave the barrels
looking a bit uneven.
well and good, but there's another spectre looming on the horizon.
Y'see it's not just the key barrels and rod screws that wear - the
pillars wear too. "How can that be?" I hear you ask, "Nothing
moves in them...they just sit there!". And so they do, but
every time you press and release a key it imparts a knock to the
rod screw, which in turn imparts a knock to the pillar(s) through
which it runs. It's a bit like the proverbial bird pecking away
at a mountain - give it enough time and the damage will show.
When this happens it means that you can tighten up the keywork all
you like but the keys will still be able to move laterally. And
what's worse is there's sometimes more free play in the pillars
than there is in the keywork - probably because pillar wear is something
that gets overlooked during servicing.
Here's a good example of it... and you can really see how much movement
there is on the rod screw.
that translates into action movement can be quite spectacular.
There's a bit of free play in the key barrels on this soprano, but
by far the bigger problem is that the entire stack is able to move
back and forth. It's not down to wear on this occasion, rather it's
down to poor manufacturing - but the end result is exactly the same.
This has grave implications for the internal regulation of the key
stack, and means that whatever combination of keys you press down
- no matter how well-set the pads are - there will always be a leak
on the stack. That's a big problem on any horn - - and I can tell
you that it's the most common cause of vagueness in the low notes,
but it's especially problematic on something as small as a soprano.
Fortunately there are a couple of ways to deal
with this pesky problem, the first of which is (to my way of thinking)
a bit of a bodge.
You can peen the pillars. This requires the use of a peening tool,
which is nothing more than very hefty pair of pliers that has a
steel dome or ball on one of the jaws and a flat on the other. You
position the dome in one of the holes, place the other jaw on the
other side of the pillar....and squeeze like hell. As the ball gets
forced into the pillar it displaces the metal around it...some (and
only some) of which ends up reducing the diameter of the hole. You
then repeat the process for the other side of the pillar.
It sort of works, but it doesn't do a lot for the face of the pillar,
and even less for the side of the pillar that houses the head of
the screw. And because it's a bit of a bodge it's not really a repair
that will last a very great deal of time. Fine if you're on a budget
or just want to flog the damn horn, but not what you'd call the
A more advanced method is to bush the pillars.
This is rather complicated. You must first ream out the pillars
oversize. Then you turn down a brass rod to fit the hole you just
reamed, and you drill an accurate pilot hole through it. You then
insert the rod into the pillar and soft solder it in place. You
trim up the ends to match the width of the pillar head and then
you ream the bush out to the required size...taking care that the
hole you're reaming aligns with any others along the path of the
It's a fair bit of work, and it carries with it the risk that the
lacquer might get scorched in the soldering process - but thereafter
it restores the pillar to its original specification. And it won't
wear out again for a very long time.
what if I told you there was another method of tightening the action
that restores it to at least as good as new spec (often better),
that doesn't mark the key barrels, that deals with both wear in
the barrel and on the barrel ends at the same time...and sorts out
the wear in the pillars too?
Welcome to the wonderful world of key reaming.
Simply put, you don't 'reduce' the free play - you cut it out altogether
- and then you make up the difference by fitting an oversized rod.
How much oversized? Well, that depends on how far you want or need
to go. Let's go back to that poor old Conn 10M I referred to at
the top end of this article. It typically has a rod screw diameter
of 2.84mm. By the time the horn's done a few tours and been through
a few owners (none of whom have looked after it terribly well) the
action is likely to be - as the saying goes - worn to bloody buggery.
If it's that badly worn then you'll probably have to step the rod
screw size up to 2.92mm - which, if you've done your maths, is 0.08mm
larger. It's not much, is it?
It might even be the case that the larger rod will fit straight
through the keys and the barrels and thus be almost a straight swap
- though this would put the action back to state similar to it having
been merely swedged well. For many players this is a sensible option.
It restores most of the accuracy of the keywork, doesn't damage
anything and works out reasonably cheap - given that all the repairer
has to do is cut a thread on the rod and cut it to length. And perhaps
ream out the odd key/pillar or two. However, it doesn't do much
for stretching the key barrels - but then with a tighter fit on
the new rod screw you don't have to go at the swedging pliers with
a gorilla grip.
If the 2.92 rod fits through most of the keys
you might want to consider going up a step. This would typically
be 3.00mm - which is still only 0.16mm larger than the original
rod. This would probably require you to ream all of the keys and
pillars - but in so doing you clean up the bores of the barrels
and take out most, if not all, of those wear pockets. And because
you've had to remove a slightly larger amount of material from the
bore of the barrels, the process of doing so will stretch them -
usually enough to to take up the axial (end to end) wear.
Of course, the rod screw sizes vary from horn to horn. Selmers,
for example, use a 2.78mm rod for the main stacks and larger keys
- so the most likely step-up for a well-worn MkVI would be 2.84mm.
what are the cons? After all, it's clear that swedging the keys
has a few - surely reaming the keywork has some?
From a mechanical perspective, none that I can think of. Yes, it's
true that the process of reaming the keys removes material (which
can't easily be replaced), but it's not quite as clear-cut as that.
For example, wear removes material - so if you're doing a straight
swap to a slightly oversized rod there's a good chance that you
won't be removing any material at all. If you step up a size and
have to break out the reamers, you're still not removing very much
material at all. And remember what I said earlier - that wear begets
wears. By making a half-arsed job of removing such wear you're just
pushing the problem further down the line. It's much better to go
in with all guns blazing and sort it out once and for all...or at
least for the next half-century.
As to the reamers themselves, typically these
will be shop-made tools. They're simple to make, cheaper and just
as effective (if not more so) than shop-bought tools...assuming
you can even find them in the appropriate sizes and lengths. The
replacement rod screw steel is typically silver steel (also known
as drill rod), which means it can be heat treated to harden it -
so not only do you have a ready supply of potential rod screws,
you also have exactly the right material from which to fashion a
reamer. At a pinch you can even make a reamer (for brass) out of
plain steel. You'll get one or two cuts out of it before you need
to grind a new cutting edge on it - but you'd really only want to
go down this route for a one-off job or an obscure size of rod.
There are a variety of designs to choose from,
but I've found that the basic D-bit reamer (as shown above left)
is all I need most of the time - but I also use a tri-point style
of reamer (shown above right). Takes a bit longer to make but tends
to work better on harder metals, such as nickel silver. And as with
all tools there's a bit of technique involved. I tend to start by
degreasing everything and use the reamers dry on brass. Nickel silver
sometimes benefits from a little cutting oil, but for the most part
you have to rely on feel. You can certainly make life a lot easier
on yourself by taking one or two undersized cuts before going for
the final size. It's not that a well-honed reamer won't tackle a
reasonably large step up, it's just that the risk of the tool binding
in the barrel increases. When this happens it places you in a very
precarious position, in which you have to decide whether to push
on through or try to back the reamer out. If you make the wrong
call there's a chance that the reamer will lock itself tight in
the barrel and snap in two - and then you're in a whole heap of
trouble. Unfortunately there are few hard and fast rules about the
process, especially since what works well for the keys on one horn
might not work at all well on the keys from a different one depending
on the grade and quality of brass used. In the case of Chinese Ultra-Cheap
horns - which benefit tremendously from oversized rods from new
- pushing through with gusto is the way to go.
I also find the length of the cutting blade makes a difference to
the finished job. An acute angle on the cutting face will make for
a faster cut, and one that can remove a great deal of material -
but the surface finish of the barrel's bore won't be so smooth,
and so will usually require quite a bit of lapping. A less acute
angle makes for a longer and more gently tapered cutting edge, which
gives a nicer and more progressive cut - but it comes at the cost
of speed and some weakness in the tool.
guess that some people will be horrified at the prospect of cutting
chunks of brass out of a horn, and some might suggest that changing
the specification of the rod screw affects the horn's originality
or that reaming the barrels makes them thinner.
My response to that is that swedging the keywork changes the specification
of the key barrels and also makes them thinner - so it's six of
one and half a dozen of the other. Reaming, at the very least, does
a much better job of restoring the functionality and accuracy of
the action. Yes, it will probably make the wall of the barrels slightly
thinner - but not really by very much at all...and with a slightly
larger rod screw fitted you've actually increased the bearing surfaces
(if only fractionally) which results in less wear over a given period
of time...and as mentioned earlier, wear makes the barrel wall thinner
for cutting chunks of brass out of a horn - well yes, it does do
that...but so does tightening the action by swedging. You're still
going to have to square up the ends of the key barrels and face
off the pillars in order to ensure a precise key fit. It's all about
choosing a method of dealing with a problem that does the least
amount of damage and gives the best results in the long term.
I'm going to finish up this article by showing
a truly ghastly example of what can go wrong when you either don't
know what you're doing and/or don't have the right tools.
This is a fine old Conn 10M. It's survived for around 90 years with
little more than a few minor dings and a spot of fading lacquer
here and there. In other words a very nice example of a well-treated
vintage beauty. Or at least it was up until the point that someone
decided to tighten the action.
This, my friends, is one of the worst examples of swedging I've
ever seen in my entire life. From looking at the serrations on the
right hand side of the key it's clear that a pair of linesman's
pliers were used - like these ones on the right. It would still
be quite bad if they'd merely crimped the barrels, but you can see
on the other end of the key that they've rotated it too. Oh, the
And as much as I turn my nose up at the practice of end-swedging,
on this occasion I'm thoroughly relieved that they adhered to this
make-do method. Can you imagine what would have happened had they
run the pliers all the way along the key barrel...?